| 1: Departmental Mission/Vision Statement | http://coe.westga.edu/cep/mission.html |
|
| 2: Departmental Statement of Goals, Process to Assess These Goals, and Assessment Results | http://coe.westga.edu/cep/Effectiveness.html |
|
| 3: Departmental Statement of Curriculum Learning Outcomes, Processes to Assess These Outcomes, and Assessment Results for each Degree Program | http://coe.westga.edu/cep/Effectiveness.html |
|
| 4: Statement of Departmental Condition - please indicate the specific strengths and weaknesses of your department. | ||
| Strengths: Faculty in the department
are national leaders in the transforming school counseling initiative;
the M.Ed. programs in school and community counseling hold national
accreditation from the Council for Accreditation of Counseling and
Related Educational programs (CACREP) - one of only four such programs
in Georgia and one of 16 in the Southeast; the department has been
the recipient of the largest ($515,000) grant (Wallace Reader's Digest
Fund) from a private source in the history of UWG; the department
was recognized and honored as a national "pioneer" in school counseling
by the Education Trust in November, 2002; and programs in the department
are held in high esteem by graduates, supervisors of graduates, and
employers. Average ratings of the program by graduates was 3.6 (out
of possible 4.0), 3.8 by employers, and 3.9 by supervisors. The full
report can be located at http://coe.westga.edu/cep/ProgramEval.html Weaknesses: Faculty in the department have significant teaching loads compared to institutions that we "compete" with and, in the past, higher loads than required by NCATE for those teaching graduate courses. This issue has been placed in our strategic plan and has been addressed. Additionally, many graduate classes are too large. Opportunities: Enrollment in the department remains very strong. The counseling program is among the largest in the United States. At this point in the life of the department, the challenge is too many students or, worded differently, not enough faculty resources to handle the number of students and opportunities that are available. The real opportunity at this time, lies in two areas: developing a doctoral program and developing specialty certification areas within the community counseling program in particular. Even with the Ed.D. Program in School Improvement, the demand is strong for a doctoral program in counseling. This, of course, would require resources beyond the capacities of the Department at the current time. The functionality and demand for the doctoral program, in particular, is very high by students and others outside the department. It should be noted, that a proposal for an Ed.D. in Counseling was submitted in the summer of 1997 and was approved at the Department and College level. It was the first doctoral program proposed (along with a Leadership in Education program) at UWG. The proposals were the predecessor to the current Ed.D. in School Improvement that was approved several years ago. The concept of specialty, non-degree certifications has the potential to bring in many "advanced" students such as those interested in drug and alcohol abuse, rehabilitation counseling, marriage and family counseling, and other related areas. |
||
|
||
| 5: Percent of Students passing licensing, certification, or other accreditation examinations related to their chosen field | 91 |
|
| 6: Proportion of graduating students going on to graduate or professional schools | 100 |
|
| 7: Types of Licensure | ||
|
||
| 8: How does the department prepare students for Licensure? | ||
|
||
| 9: Other notable achievements | ||
| The most notable achievements of the
department include: (1) one of six departments in the United States to receive a grant from the Wallace Reader's Digest Fund to transform school counseling (institutions who applied but did not receive this grant include many of the largest and most well known research universities in the United States); (2) continued national accreditation by the Council for Accreditation of Counseling and Related Educational Programs (CACREP); and the performance of students on the National Counselor Preparation Comprehensive Examination (CPCE) which is the department comprehensive/exit exam. In 2003, for example, our students scored above the mean on every subtest but two and the overall mean was considerable above the national mean. Considering the large size of our department and the types of universities that utilize the CPCE, the performance of our students is quite remarkable. In spring 03, for example, the mean score for UWG students was 101.47 versus 93.26 for students from other universities (about 8 points higherr). Of the eight categories, UWG students scored lower on only two standards and higher on six standards. In fall 02, the mean score for UWG students was 94.57 versus 88.71 for students from other universities (about 6 points higher). Of the eight categories, UWG students scored lower on only one standard (group work) than the national average and higher on seven standards. |
||
|
||
| 10: Total Published Research Papers | 5 |
|
| 11: Total Presentations | 6 |
|
| 12: Total Internships | 130 |
|
| 13: Total Co-Ops | 0 |
|
| 14: Total Scholarships | 5 |
|
| 15: Total Fellowships | 0 |
|
| 16: Total Recipients of Notable Awards | 8 |
|
| 17: Other notable achievements | ||
|
Graduate students in the department recieved the following awards:
|
||
|
||
|
||
| 18: Total New Course Developments | 0 |
|
| 19: Total Faculty Teaching Honors Courses | 0 |
|
| 20: Percent of Faculty involved in Academic Advisement | 75 |
|
|
||
| 21: Total Books and Monographs | 0 |
|
| 22: Total Book Chapters | 5 |
|
| 23: Total Peer Review Articles | 6 |
|
| 24: Total Other Shorter Works | 7 |
|
| 25: Total Paper Presentations | 30 |
|
| 26: Total Other Presentations | 0 |
|
| 27: Total In-House Publications | 4 |
|
| 28: Total Juried Exhibits/Performances | 0 |
|
| 29: Total Other Exhibits/Performances | 0 |
|
| 30: Total Positions Held in Journal Editing/Review | 9 |
|
| 31: Total Faculty involved in Notable Continuing Education Efforts | 0 |
|
|
||
| 32: Total participants in Honors Organizations | 5 |
|
| 33: Total offices held in Professional Organizations | 4 |
|
| 34: Total Advisors of Student Organizations | 3 |
|
| 35: Total Participants in Cooperative Consulting Efforts | 9 |
|
| 36: Total System-Wide/UWG Committee appointments | 24 |
|
| 37: Total participants in Public Service activities | 12 |
|
| 38: Other notable achievements by Faculty | ||
|
||
|
||
| 39: Total Proposals Submitted | 3 |
|
| 40: Total Proposals Funded | 2 |
|
| 41: Total Amount Funded | 4000.00 |
|
| 42: Total Gifts Generated by Department | 0 |
|
| 43: Total Contracts Awarded | 0 |
|
| 44: Total Fellowships Awarded | 0 |
|
| 45: New Degree Programs or Deletions | ||
| None |
||
| 46: New Departments or Other New Units; Also Any Restructuring of These | ||
| N/A |
||
| 47: Accreditation or Similar Distinction or Renewal | ||
|
||
| 48: Other Awards, Distinctions, and Achievements | ||
| N/A |
||
| 49: Additional Comments Concerning Your Department | ||
| N/A |
||
| 50: Give an example of how your department used the assessment of goals and outcomes to change/improve a process. | ||
| Our department interviews all master's
level applicants to our school counseling and community counseling
programs as well as many Ed.S. applicants (depending on certain factors).
This is time consuming but necessary to ensure the appropriateness
and quality of graduate students who will become counselors. A question
protocol was developed for school counseling applicants that has worked
effectively in addressing issues. As the department community counseling
committee reviewed the goals and outcomes of the admissions process,
it was decided to develop a similar question protocol that would address
key issues in community counseling in a systematic way. With department
approval, the change was implemented this spring and faculty believe
the process of admissions will be improved. |
||